Predictive DfR pre-assessment for flexible PE/PP-based packaging structures.
1 Case and structure input
Case identification
Layer structure Layer mass [g/m²] = thickness [µm] × density [g/cm³]
| # | Material family | Thickness [µm] | Density [g/cm³] | Mass [g/m²] | Comment |
|---|
Additional components [g/m²]
Evidence quality
2 Composition and calculations
| Material family | Mass [g/m²] | Share of total [%] |
|---|
3 Internal EN 18120-based criteria assessment
Base scenario. Thresholds are internal demonstration criteria, not official EN 18120 requirements. ⚑ marks the controlling factor.
| Rule | Criterion | Input value | Internal criterion used | Result | Technical rationale |
|---|
4 Scenario comparison
| Scenario | Target polymer [%] | EVOH [%] | PA [%] | PET [%] | Al [%] | Unknown [%] | Ink+Adh+Coat [%] | Overall result |
|---|
5 Conclusion and recommendation
6 Report preview
Regulatory context and purpose
This MVP is an internal predictive Design for Recycling pre-assessment tool for flexible plastic packaging. It is intended to support early-stage packaging development before formal EU Design for Recycling delegated acts are adopted under Regulation (EU) 2025/40.
The tool uses deterministic internal demonstration criteria inspired by EN 18120-oriented logic to estimate whether a PE/PP-based flexible packaging structure is likely to remain robust under base, conservative and severe recyclability-risk scenarios.
Why this is useful before the 2028 DfR delegated acts
- PPWR already moves packaging portfolios towards recyclability-by-design.
- The European Commission is expected to establish detailed Design for Recycling criteria and recyclability performance grades through delegated acts by 1 January 2028.
- From 2030, packaging recyclability will be assessed through performance grades based on Design for Recycling criteria.
- Packaging teams can use predictive pre-assessment now to identify structural risks before design freeze, supplier qualification, industrial trials or external recyclability testing.
Flexible packaging scope
This demo focuses on flexible plastic packaging structures, especially PE/PP-based films and laminates used in chilled meat, processed meat, MAP, vacuum packaging, pouches, top webs, lidding films, flow-pack films, thermoforming films and barrier flexible packaging.
Limitations
This MVP does not provide EN 18120 certification, PPWR legal classification, recyclability grade A/B/C, third-party validation or physical recycling test results.
How the tool works and estimates the result
The assessment is deterministic and rules-based. It does not use artificial intelligence, document extraction or external certification data in this MVP version.
- Layer mass calculation: each layer is converted into mass per square metre using thickness and density: layer mass [g/m²] = thickness [µm] × density [g/cm³].
- Composition calculation: the tool adds all layer masses and declared components such as inks, adhesives, coatings, labels or unknown material. It then calculates the percentage contribution of each material family.
- Predominant polymer identification: the tool identifies the main structural polymer stream, normally PE or PP for this MVP scope.
- Internal demo rules: the structure is assessed against internal demonstration criteria covering target polymer content, EVOH, PA, PET, aluminium, unknown material, ink/adhesive/coating load and assessment-boundary completeness.
- Scenario modelling: the same structure is assessed under base, conservative and severe assumptions. Conservative and severe scenarios increase the burden of non-target or uncertain materials to test whether the design remains robust under less favourable assumptions.
- Confidence score: the tool estimates internal confidence from data completeness, evidence quality, scenario stability and assessment-boundary coverage.
- Development recommendation: the final recommendation translates the technical result into an early-stage development decision, such as continue development, continue with actions, develop alternative, redesign or obtain more data before decision.
The result is therefore a predictive technical estimate, not a measured recycling result. It is useful for comparing design options, identifying controlling risk factors and deciding whether a structure is mature enough to continue development before formal testing or external assessment.
Scope and limitations
Internal predictive pre-assessment for early-stage development decisions on flexible PE/PP-based packaging. It is not a certification system, not a legal compliance tool and not a grading engine. All thresholds are internal demonstration rules.